It's also for that 'outplaying' gameplay thing. There are more options to attack, which means more tactics means more outplays Dark And Darker Gold. The game currently heavily depends on gears, since there is a deficiency of gear based matchmaking and that blasting higher quality gears will bring you wins most of the time, no matter if you hit 10 or 15, because the opponent will never get killed. This isn't true.

Also, in addition to combat modifications, I would also like to see some changes in matchmaking, i personally think it's best to split it into less than blue gears/above blue gears Free(no restriction) groups, so that matchmaking is more fair. That way, even novices may be able to have some room and not have to struggle to beat the already fully gear-driven men.

Is Wizard intended to be playable?

I played and played Tarkov until I got it and started doing a little better. The game seems to borrow from Tarkov in its loot system but does not have the same gameplay. There's a difference between "You were snatched because you moved through a wide space while fighting scavs giving away your position" or "this fly-by night insect worked two Ice bolts as well as a lightning strike, but killed you with just 3 strikes".

The first can be learned from and learn from. But the latter can't be learned from. It's not necessary to run backwards or circle around or use bait attacks to move back. I'm a wizard. If I'm not capable of doing damage, what do I have to offer? Do you really believe that the meta is "use every single you have a spell for each room + do a meditation before you leave"?

I've not tried group play at this point, but might do it in the near future, however, I'm not sure if I'm making a difference if I hit my teammates with spells (which I'm thinking would be the case as enemies have the ability to strike each with each other). It's not possible to put 3 players against 4 zombies in one tiny space with no verticality and expect to have front, mid and back lines Dark And Darker Gold for sale.